Brilliant photography to inspire you, mesmerise you and make you think!

Analyse these cartoons

To which South African news event does this refer?
What is the inherent message in both cartoons?

An Abandoned Bundle - A poem that is real to this day

Born to be dumped

KATHARINE CHILD and GRAEME HOSKEN | 29 May, 2012 01:0212 Comments

The body of a newborn baby, dumped in a storm-water drain in Marabastad, Pretoria, is removed yesterday Picture: DANIEL BORN

The only evidence of the birth of a baby girl was an emergency blanket lying on a Pretoria pavement and a stone keeping the wind from blowing it away.

Beneath the blanket lay the tiny lifeless body of an infant, its umbilical chord still attached. The infant had been wrapped in pieces of newspaper, put in a black plastic shopping bag and dropped into a storm-water drain.

The horrific discovery came within days of a foetus being dumped in Pretoria's Church Square, less than a kilometre away.

Born on Sunday - a day before Child Protection Week started - the abandoning of this newborn offers a small glimpse into what appears to be becoming a far too regular occurrence in cities across South Africa.

Kelvin Khumalo, who found the baby at around 10am, described what he saw yesterday.

"I looked under the bridge. I saw blood and feet. I was not sure that it was a baby but when I looked again I realised it was. I could see the umbilical chord floating in the water."

The baby had become like "normal" debris in the drain - plastic, rubbish, wire, old blankets, rotting food - and was kept company by large scavenging rats.

But government departments appear to shy away from the problem of child abandonment.

When asked for comment on the phenomenon, Sello Mokoena, spokesman for Gauteng's department of social development, said he did not know the extent of the problem. More research, he said, was needed.

"Given current media reports, it would seem the problem is increasing. One cannot emphatically say it is. This issue needs to be researched."

Mokoena said the department had received reports only of 10 babies being abandoned in Gauteng in the 2011-2012 financial year, but he admitted that the problem was under-reported.

But the discovery of the lifeless newborn baby girl yesterday must be viewed within the context of growing concern about the welfare and safety of South Africa's children and their vulnerability.

In its 2011 report on South Africa's children, Unicef said that 86600 were in need of care and 500000 were in foster care.

Of the country's 19million children, 45% were sent to child- and youth-care centres after being abandoned. About 4000 cases of child neglect are reported to the police annually.

Yesterday, Johannesburg Child Welfare social worker Rose Miya said her organisation received nine abandoned babies a month.

She ascribed this to poverty, saying it was the key reason for mothers believing that they had no choice but to dump their babies.

But Johannesburg Child Advocacy Forum convenor Luke Lamprecht said abandoned babies must be seen in relation to "a massive level of inaction when it comes to protecting children".

"Both the government and society are not doing enough to mitigate the impending disaster, which the violation of children's rights will result in."

Lamprecht said speaking in legal terms when describing what was happening to children sanitised the true horror of the situation.

"We need to call the abuse of children's rights by what it really is. We must ensure that our children get the protection they deserve.

"Sanitisation has resulted in massive numbers of abandoned children being hidden away from the very means needed to protect them.

"South Africa's children are abandoned on multiple levels by families, communities and the government.

"The government has a right to ensure the protection of children, society has the right not to infringe on their rights, and parents are required to enforce both these rights."

Lamprecht warned that, if the rights of children continued to be ignored, South Africa could "end up with a group of children with serious psychological problems who will continue the cycle".

"Children's rights begin with a name at birth, and their right to protection, safety and a loving family."

Lisa Pfalzgraf, a volunteer for Doors of Hope, a Christian group that runs homes for unwanted babies in Johannesburg, said the organisation had been looking after 54 abandoned babies for the past few months.

Priscilla McKay, a member of the Child Welfare NGO, said the problem had become worse.

"It is definitely something to be concerned about," she said.

Childline's national training and advocacy manager, Joan van Niekerk. said: "The cumulative number of living abandoned babies this year is at its highest.

"Child Welfare earlier this year said it had 2600 abandoned babies on its caseload countrywide.

"I am surprised that there are not more abandoned babies, given the lack of services. When young mothers are discharged from hospital there is no assessment of their emotional health, wellbeing or capacity to be a parent.

"If the mother has been abandoned by her family there is very little support. There is nothing done to stop women from dumping their babies.

"We talk about mothers and hold them responsible, but many times the mothers are abandoned by the baby's father."

On the lighter side

Verb agreement / concord

Active and Passive voice

On the lighter side

Good luck with your exams! Hope they're not too scary!

Always double-check! What is wrong with these?

Passive voice

Passive Voice (Why It is Evil and How to Recognize It.) Two "voices" occur in English grammar: active voice and passive voice. The difference is subtle at first, but it's easy to master once the grammarian understands the basics. Look at the subject and the main verb in the two sentences below: (A) The boy hit the ball. (B) The ball was hit. (Or, "The ball was hit by the boy"). In sentence A, we might ask ourselves, what is it that does the hitting? The answer is the subject, boy. That subject is actively performing the verb; it is actively "doing" the verb hit to a direct object (the ball). This virtuous sentence is in active voice. In sentence B, we might ask ourselves what is the subject? (ball.) What is the subject doing? (nothing.) The subject is not hitting anything else. So who exactly is doing the verb to hit? It is not clear unless we stick a prepositional phrase "by the boy" on the end of the sentence. The subject is passively sitting, doing nothing, while some outside agent performs the action (hitting). Since the subject of the sentence is passive grammatically, this wicked sentence in is passive voice. Note: Sometimes the passive voice sentence is necessary when the speaker wants to hide the agent or obscure what occurs. For instance, a governor up for reelection might say, "In the last election, taxes were raised over the course of the year." The passive voice sentence hides the agent. It would be uncomfortable for him to tell potential voters, "In the last election, I raised taxes over the course of the year." In that last sentence, the one doing the action is painfully clear! This type of situation is one of the few times that passive form proves useful, albeit in a somewhat deceptive way I would discourage. In almost all other cases, it is better rhetoric to use active voice. It is a better choice for several reasons: (1) Active voice sentences are often more concise than passive voice. Expressing the same idea in passive voice frequently takes 30% to 40% more words: The fighter punched Ali and dodged the uppercut. (Active voice--8 words) Ali was punched by the fighter, and then an uppercut was dodged by him. (Passive voice--14 words, about 40% longer) In the last generation, the family built a new house and raised a new brood of children. (Active voice: 17 words) In the last generation, a new house was built by the family, and a new brood of children was raised by them.(Passive voice--25 words, about 30% longer) (2) Passive voice requires more "weak" words. It uses abstract words like is /am /are /was /were /being /been, the demonstrative pronoun (the), and prepositions like by and of. These are dull and shapeless in contrast with "strong" words: i.e., concrete nouns, powerful verbs, and vivid adjectives. Good writers try to avoid these empty, weak words and replace them with strong words. However, passive voice often traps writers. To make clear who is doing what, writers using passive voice must either tag unwieldy phrases at the end of clauses, such as "by so-and-so," or they must leave out this phrase and let the sentence become unclear. The airplane was flown to Bermuda (by the pilot). The crackers were eaten (by the puppy) and the bowl was licked clean (by the puppy). In the moonlight, the tango was danced (by the couple). To be verbs and the prepositions do not add much to the sentence in terms of color. It would be better to write the following: The pilot flew the airplane to Bermuda. The puppy ate the crackers and licked the bowl clean. In the moonlight, the couple danced the tango. Remember, the heart of your sentence beats in its strong verbs, concrete nouns, and vivid description! Prepositions and articles are dead weight. If you understand that, your writing will be more direct and powerful if fewer prepositions and articles clog your sentences. Using active voice consistently is one way to ensure that doesn't happen. (3) The passive voice clause can be confusing or unclear, especially in long sentences. My car has been driven to Dallas. (By whom? By the speaker? By a car-thief? By the teletubbies?) Sixteen thousand calories were consumed in one sitting. (Who is doing this monstrous act of dietary suicide?) Five FBI agents entered the room, and the terrorist was plastered against the wall. (Does that mean the five FBI agents plastered the terrorist against the wall? Or does it mean when the five FBI agents entered the room, the terrorist had plastered himself against the wall? Or did someoneelse entirely plaster the terrorist against the wall before the FBI arrived? It is impossible to tell with passive voice structure in the last clause.) However, the author frequently doesn't know who did the action either.The agent doing the action might truly be unknown. A woman was mugged last night in Las Vegas. My diary has been stolen! In sentences like these, it is difficult to assert whether it would be better to leave the passive voice (which in this case is fairly concise), or to add active voice structure (which in these cases, adds extra length). When in doubt, I suggest you stick with active voice. An assailant mugged a woman last night in Las Vegas. A thief stole my diary! (4) Passive voice often leads to awkward or stilted writing, especially in academic arguments in which the student dons a "scholarly" tone. When a reason is to be considered by readers for an argument that has been made by a writer, it is fitting that their analysis be based upon the latest statistical evidence. If consensus cannot be reached, compromises should be made, and then negotiations should be undertaken by both parties with arbitration done by an outside listener. Ugh! What lousy sentences! It hurts my head to read them. These sound more like jumbled "scholarese" rather than useful, direct, rhetorical exhortations. If sentence after sentence appears in this twisted format, the writer will drive the reader insane with his contorted, artificial syntax. Nobody speaks that way, so why write that way? (5) Linguistic studies show that native English speakers are better able to remember material they read in active voice than the same material in passive voice. Something about the English speaker's mind remains geared toward a "Subject-Verb-Object" pattern. Passive voice sentences somehow derail that mental process of retention. If you want your readers to remember what you write, use active voice. If they better remember the material you spent so much time writing, you have a better chance at creating an argument that will stick with them and change their way of thinking. Three Warning Signs of the Unholy Sentence Construction (Passive Voice) If you spot the dreaded passive voice, cleanse your paper of its infernal taint! Convert the sentence to active voice. Ask yourself three questions to identify the evil sentence. 1. Is there a form of the verb "to be" in the sentence, such as is/ am/ are/ was/ were/ be/ being /been? (It is impossible to create the passive voice unless the author uses a "to be" verb.) 2. Could one insert the phrase "by so-and-so" after the verb? If so, would the sentence still make sense? If so, you may have passive voice. For instance, "the dog was fed" (by his owner). 3. Identify the subject and the main verb in the clause. Is the subject "doing" the action? Or is it sitting passively while some outside agent "does" the verb to the subject? Passive Voice Exercise: Egad! Some grammatical vandal has converted E. B. White's active voice sentences into passive voice structure. Rescue his writing! Convert the passage to active voice, and compare the two. Exercise A: One summer, along about 1904, a camp was rented by my father on a lake in Maine, and we were taken there for the month of August. Ringworm was gotten from some kittens, and Pond's Extract had to be rubbed on our arms and legs night and morning, and a canoe was rolled over in by my father with all his clothes on; outside of that the vacation was thought to be a success, and from then on it was thought that there was no place like that lake in Maine. It was returned to summer after summer--always on the first of August for one month. Since then a saltwater man has been made out of me, but sometimes in summer I am made to wish for the placidity of a lake in the woods by the restlessness of the tides and the fearful cold of the sea water in the afternoon and evening, which is blown across by the incessant wind. A few weeks ago this feeling was experienced by me so strongly that a couple of bass hooks and a spinner were bought and the lake that used to be visited by us was returned to by me for a week's fishing to be done and for old haunts to be revisited. --adapted from "Once More to the Lake," by E. B. White. (Forgive, me, Mr. White, for the stylistic blasphemy I have made of your work.) Exercise B: Convert the following to active voice and hear how much easier it is to understand! My dating life has been ruined by my new room mate, Joey. Joey's not a rude guy, or anything. Far from it, he's actually friendly and good-natured. Women are driven from my life by his lack of house cleaning. Our apartment is the social equivalent of a cancerous tumor. When the building is entered by one of my dates, the first object that is noticed by her is that a trashcan is moldered in by an apple half-eaten by someone. The edge of the television is drooped over by a slice of week-old pizza. She is buzzed at angrily by a swarm of flies, before a pile of unwashed socks is settled back down on by them. Perhaps those socks gleamed white in some distant age, fresh from K-Mart, but no longer. Visitors are nauseated by the smell; the coup de grace is administered by that part. When the apartment is entered by a woman, the girl is fought back against by the apartment. Invaders are driven off by Joey's slovenliness far more effectively than any security system. Sure, small talk will be made by the girl for a while, whose nose is wrinkled up by her. Sure, a drink or two will be had, and the bottle and glass eyed suspiciously for unidentifiable stains. The problem is that the apartment is never stayed in long by her, and my phone calls are never returned by her afterward. A new room mate is needed by me. Otherwise, my love life will be destroyed by Joey.

Phrases and clauses

To understand punctuation, it is helpful to understand the difference between a phrase and a clause. I. A phrase is a collection of words that may have nouns or verbals, but it does not have a subject doing a verb. The following are examples of phrases: leaving behind the dog smashing into a fence before the first test after the devastation between ignorance and intelligence broken into thousands of pieces because of her glittering smile In these examples above, you will find nouns (dog, fence, test, devastation, ignorance, intelligence, thousands, pieces). You also have some verbals (leaving, smashing), but in no case is the noun functioning as a subject doing a predicate verb. They are all phrases. II. A clause is a collection of words that has a subject that is actively doing a verb. The following are examples of clauses: since she laughs at diffident men I despise individuals of low character when the saints go marching in Obediah Simpson is uglier than a rabid racoon because she smiled at him. In the examples above, we find either a noun or a pronoun that is a subject (bold-print and red) attached to a predicate verb (underlined and purple) in each case: since she laughs at diffident men I despise individuals of low character when the saints go marching in Obediah Simpson is uglier than a rabid racoon because she smiled at him III. If the clause could stand by itself, and form a complete sentence with punctuation, we call the clause an independent clause. The following are independent clauses: I despise individuals of low character Obediah Simpson is uglier than a rabid racoon We could easily turn independent clauses into complete sentences by adding appropriate punctuation marks. We might say, "I despise individuals of low character." Or we might write, "Obediah Simpson is uglier than a rabid racoon!" We call them independent because these types of clauses can stand independently by themselves, without any extra words attached, and be complete sentences. IV. Dependent clauses have a subject doing a verb, but they have a subordinate conjunction placed in front of the clause. That subordinate conjunction means that the clause can't stand independently by itself and become a complete sentence. Instead, the dependent clause is dependent upon another clause--it can't make a complete sentence by itself, even though it has a subject doing a verb. Here are some examples of dependent clauses: since she laughs at diffident men when the saints go marching in because she smiled at him These clauses simply do not form complete thoughts or sentences by themselves. Those subordinate conjunctions--since, when, and because--cause the listener to expect some extra material. The thought is incomplete. If you walked up to a friend in the dorms and said, "since she laughs at diffident men," and then walked away without adding an independent clause, the friend would be completely baffled. It's important to understand the difference between phrases, dependent clauses, and independent clauses because many punctuation marks--such as commas, semicolons, and colons, require one or the other

I love 'Twilight'!

Appearance versus reality